<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Stacks of Shame - an epitaph of bad coding...</title>
	<link>http://www.stacksofshame.com</link>
	<description>Stack of Shame</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:55:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>SHSF #2</title>
		<description>Product: MailEnable IMAP (Version 2.37/8)
Function/Size: 0×40FC59, 251,040-bytes (245.15 KB).
Here we have a prime example, and the original motivation for the creation of stacksofshame.com. Upon discovering this "gem" a few months ago, I can honestly say I almost cried. For the future of humanity is bleak if we continue to recklessly ...</description>
		<link>http://www.stacksofshame.com/2007/06/12/shsf-2/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>SHSF #1: the first of many&#8230;</title>
		<description>Here we have the first of a recurrence for stacksofshame.com, that is, a truly shameful stack-frame.

Product: BusinessMail POP3 (Version 4.70).
Function/Size: 0x406DF3, 12,256-bytes (11.04 KB).
Quite why the author thought he should allocate 12,256-bytes of stack space is truly beyond me, has he never heard of malloc()?. </description>
		<link>http://www.stacksofshame.com/2007/06/11/the-first-of-many/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Stacksofshame.com - a blog of bad coding practice</title>
		<description>As you might have guessed, this is the first post to my blog. I recently decided that stacksofshame.com would be almost entirely devoted to blogging the many terrible, awful and god damn shameful code fragments encountered during source code auditing and/or reverse engineering both commercial and open source software.

If your ...</description>
		<link>http://www.stacksofshame.com/2007/06/10/stacksofshamecom-a-blog-of-bad-coding-practice-2/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
